Here is my final video.
Honor's Media Studies Blog
Saturday, 1 April 2017
Wednesday, 29 March 2017
Friday, 10 March 2017
Rough Script Evaluation Task 4
Callum and I began writing the script for our Evaluation Task 4 which will be completed next week, it hasn't yet been completed and it is still a rough version of what we wish to eventually execute.
How did you
use media technologies in the construction and research, planning and
evaluation stages?
Throughout
the shoot we used various technologies to film our video. We used an iPad to act as a clapper board,
this then enabled us to know when to cut the video in order to keep the visuals
in time with the song during the editing stage. We held the iPad in front of
the camera lens for four seconds until a beep came on the track that signified
the song commencing. After we heard this we took the iPad out of the frame and
prepared for the take.
For the
filming of the video we used a black magic URSA mini camera which is a semi
professional cinematography camera which enabled us to create a more
professional and visually intriguing product. We switched between a variety of different
lenses throughout the shoot in order to get different framing sizes and the
sizes we used were 18mm lenses up to an 85mm lenses, the use of the 18m lens
was used to shoot the wide shots of the artist and the dancers and the 50mm
lens was used for mid shots to show costume and other symbolic conventions in
the video, and the 85mm lens was used to extreme close ups which shows a sharp
image of the artist in the foreground and an out of focus background. This
ensured that the audience were able to focues entirely on the star image and
the unique selling points (USP). We adjusted the shutter speed in the camera in
order to portray an agitated and strobe-like effect as it backed up the club theme
in order to abide by the genre of the music we were representing. In order to
achieve this we incorporated lighting that was programmed prior to the shoot. The
lights were an aspect of the mise en scene of the electronic genre we wanted to
portray. Thus incorporating technical conventions to make the video a more
accurate representation of the artist.
As we were
filming, each member of the group would take turns operating the camera the
others would watch the TV in the studio that was linked directly to the camera
feed. This allowed the observers to make judgements on the framing and ensured that
the footage was always appropriate and aesthetically pleasing, this in turn the
whole process a lot more efficient in the sense that if a shot wasn’t working we
could immediately see this and change it. Occasionally we were able to turn the
TV to face Jonty so he was able to see himself as this enabled him to visualise
what we wanted him to do, ensuring that he could deliver a realistic DJ
performance which according to Keith Negus is a fundamental element that should
be incorporated in music videos.
Once the
production shoot was finished, we began editing the clips together in an
offline edit. The editing process began with naming all the clips and arranging
them into an easily accessible order. We did this on Adobe Premier Pro which is
an ‘off the shelf’ consumer software which enables people to create semi
professional products. We began by attempting to create a rough performance cut
of the video to play around with clips and see what worked in certain orders. We
agreed that the video had to be edited through the use of a rhythmic editing
style which simply means cutting to the beat of the song. We then found that
because of the pace of the song due to hidden accents and off beats, we found
that the use of the blade tool would be beneficial to use. We utilised the
arrow keys on the keyboard to enable a second by second preview of shots, which
was crucial as our track was so quick and accented so we needed to make
accurate cuts in order to present the energetic aspect of the electronic genre.
We were encouraged to focus more on the final edit, which meant paying attention
to detail, rather than making a rough cut that would eventually be scrapped and
re-made. This advice enabled the process to be a lot less time consuming and
enabled us all to focus on the small details in every shot. After we had
finished the product we began to do an online edit which consisted of adjusting
and correcting until we felt it was fit for purpose. Once the product was green
lit, we were able to export it and upload it to YouTube which was used as a
tool for us to document and expose our music video, as well as a platform for
inspiration in the research and planning stage.
Tuesday, 7 March 2017
Evaluation Task 4
In class we discussed and went through all of the digital technologies we have used within our A2 year, this consisted of hardware, software and online technology. The most important aspect of the hardware was the Canon 5D as this is what we filmed on and it enabled us to actually, physically film our music video to the best of our ability. software enabled us to edit our music video together using offline and online edits. This allowed us to sync up the lips of the artist with the music itself. We used online technologies such as YouTube in order to upload our video, as well as to research other media texts in order to gain inspiration. In my A2 year I have learnt a vast array of techniques which allowed me to create a music video to the best standard I could have.
I have learned from my audience feedback that I have constructed an intended star image and an effective campaign. My target audience has informed me what went well, for example, through the audience feedback I learnt that some people were finding the video quite difficult to follow as there is so much going on. If I was to make any future changes to the campaign I would edit seeing the star image as more synthetic, and as a result of this we learnt to make it obvious that our artist was focused on his music rather than his image. .
Taking note of the audience feedback I understand how the audience inform me the success of the campaign is and indeed allowed me time to make adjustments to the campaign before it went to distribution. Audience feedback is important market testing in post-production to see if I created the right star image and marketed this purposefully. As Henry Jenkins informs us that we live in a ‘participatory culture’, where fans and audiences are important in circulating meaning and the strength of media messages.
I also recognise that my audience has engaged with the meanings in my music video in different ways, bringing their own contexts to the reading of the star image – what Hall argues is reception theory. I can understand how my audience can either reinforce or challenge intended meanings in the text.
Friday, 24 February 2017
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)